March 11, 2009
Just finished revising 40 pp of my first draft of Gilgamesh. Boy, tablet I & II were really a mess.
I noticed something kind of funny, and maybe one of the 3 or 4 people who read this site would like to comment. I didn’t have the original font (Garnet) installed on the computer I was working on, so the printout came in Arial. For some reason, I found it immensely easier to cut and radically change the MS, I think, than if I was using the fancy font. I’ve decided to use only ugly fonts from now on, at least when drafting. I think having something look pretty on the page gave me the misplaced perception that a work was finished. I’m even wondering if I should drop the whole pretty font entirely from submitting as well. After all, what if someone dislikes the font. It’s probably better to use something more common in any case, to be on the same footing as everyone else.
All this is probably a bit–I don’t know–ironic in the context: Gilgamesh was originally written in cuneiform, with a wedge shape on wet clay which was then baked or dried.
1 Comment |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by pmpoetry
January 25, 2009
Wordsandpoetry.com Says:
January 25, 2009 at 3:32 pm edit
NEW! PROOFREADING,CRITIQUE AND PUBLISHING SERVICES FOR WRITERS OF POETRY AND MANUSCRIPTS! INTRODUCING, “WORDSANDPOETRY.COM” poem and manuscript proofreading, critique, book publishing, poetry contest, message board, -also featuring web advertising for published authors/writers!
–>Will add to pmpoetry.com tonight…
Leave a Comment » |
Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by pmpoetry
January 23, 2009
There is also explication posted on Daniel Klotz’s website. At times, he seems to belabor the obvious:
Allusion abounds. Many of the images are poignant
because they call up greater significance in our minds.
“Picked the cotton,” for instance, is about much more
than just any person in any field picking any cotton.
It alludes to our national history and to racial disunity
that continues to permeate our culture.
Aside from that quibble, he presents a good read. It might be very worthwhile to include this in a secondary school poetry class.
2 Comments |
News, Poetry, Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by pmpoetry
January 23, 2009
The full text, with lineation is on the New York Times website.
I’ve been thinking a lot about Elizabeth Alexander’s poem, as I’m sure a lot of other poets have. It is a remarkable and rare moment that poetry gets any kind of public attention, at least in the US.
It was extremely accessible piece. It left me wondering how close a poem could be to ordinary speech without ceasing to be a poem.
I don’t think the inauguration would have been a good place to trot out poetic pyrotechnics, what Mary Leader once simply summed up as “fancy.”
Another problem with presenting a poem before millions is nuance and ambiguity, hyperbole, any of which might make for an interesting poem, but leave an audience puzzled or offended.
Is the Washington Mall the place to read any good poem?
Leave a Comment » |
News, Poetry, Uncategorized |
Permalink
Posted by pmpoetry